The new age of autocrats
Compte rendu : The new age of autocrats. Recherche parmi 300 000+ dissertationsPar gggg63 • 25 Mars 2021 • Compte rendu • 306 Mots (2 Pages) • 517 Vues
“The new age of autocrats”
From Putin to Trump: why political strongmen keep winning.
BY JOHN CONNELLY
The new age of autocrats (newstatesman.com)
This article in The Newstatesman proposes to study the success of authoritarian leaders based on the
analysis of Applebaum, a journalist and author specialised in communism and author of “The
Twilight of democracy”.
Vocabulary:
● enlightener → illuminateur
● decency → décence
● predicament → impasse
● the movement’s standard-bearer → le porte-drapeau du mouvement
● twilight → crépuscule
● revealing insights → perspectives révélatrices
● sweeping → radical
● dispassionate → objectif, impartial
● smuggling → contrebande
● children in tow → enfants à charge
● careerism → cariérisme
● sibling rivalry → rivalité fraternelle
Summary:
Applebaum and Connely ask the same question: how does one become a proponent of
authoritarianism? According to Applebaum, democracies are born and disappear, but we can't explain
why, but according to Connely, a clue can be found in the history and analysis of populism. Populism
feeds on economic crises and the failures of democracy, especially when it is no longer able to
produce effective social policies. If populists fail to provide a better life for their constituents, the only
thing they have to offer is hatred. Ultimately, history teaches us that to get out of an authoritarian
political hell, it is necessary to fight for democracy by putting in power people attached to nuance and
not to extremes.
Personal comments:
This article offers a critique of Applebaum's work to understand why authoritarian leaders are so
successful, then and now. Connely helps us understand Applebaum's point of view by telling his life
story. Without trying to describe Applebaum, Connery nevertheless explains that his work is not
always convincing and has dead ends. The author, a history professor, compares Applebaum's work
with his own vision and experience of authoritarianism to give a personal explanation. The vocabulary
used by Connelly suggests to the reader that his vision of things is the most relevant because he starts
from
...