Les lois américaines
Documents Gratuits : Les lois américaines. Recherche parmi 300 000+ dissertationsPar fatouk • 19 Février 2013 • 701 Mots (3 Pages) • 764 Vues
For the American law, the problem was for yahoo inc., the property in china with the jailer for person. Y-the difficulty was in yahoo inc, they are loyal to the us law particularly but when the mandatory was Chinese, and yahoo has to refer to china law.
Can be parent in American law for what happen in India?
ABC: American Boy Chinese
To learn about law, the fact is not how you will earn about the case, but how could you achieve by acquiring.
Criminal law in USA:
Principle 1:
With a law, no crime. We cannot be persuading in criminal law.
No legislative in absence of criminal, you can not be contact to the crime
In American law, you have a federal criminal law that uploads to subject matters. Each stage also has a criminal
In order to contact criminal, we must be proof, criminal proof, innocence presumption. Trouver des preuves, pour prouver que le crime a bien été commis.
In civil case, the proof of doubt is in balance of probability: you can have a doubt, reasonable doubt . Balance of probability is may be commuting act, may be not
A civil case is a dispute between private parties. A criminal law
In French law, l’action publique peut etre declenchée par la partie civile.
In American law, the sanction can be expressing by jailer, exclusion,
In civil case, there are behaviour stocks,
In American law, james simpson, ex footballer, is was accusing to beat his ex wife’s ex boyfriend, He was acquitted. They proof in balance probability, that he was not committed the murder? Balance of probability is in the civil case.
In French law, l’intime conviction, the proof is replacing by the intima conviction. There is not obligation to proof but to believe in the intimate conviction.
We have to proof 2 things, if we want the person goes in jail:
Material elements: to proof the contact. If the law proofs the drug is in possession of the defendant, it proofs the act
Mental elements: the intendant has the intention to commit the act, this is the right, that we call defensive. A mental element is what we call the physical element: for example: kamikaze.
Sleepwalking: no mental element
A partial defence: in a case of murder, drunkenness can reduce the think of . this mental element is the defendant measures the consequence of his act, and he is presuming to know the consequence of his act.
Intendant the result of his act, he wait for the consequence dof his act. You don’t know what Is in someone ‘s mind but you intendant the consequence of your act. You’re presuming to know the consequence. The mental element the reasonable doubt
In American law, do you thing first liber
Case MILLS VS STATE:
Mortgage
First Mortgage: an enragement,
...