Corporate Governance cas
Cours : Corporate Governance cas. Recherche parmi 300 000+ dissertationsPar Insaf Zh • 30 Novembre 2015 • Cours • 2 189 Mots (9 Pages) • 751 Vues
Corporate governance
Why study governance?
-Failure of companies
-Loneliness
-Efficiency
-Stakeholders
- Definitions and Evolution of the cultural and legal environment
- Way of sharing the power between management and shareholders.
- Corporate governance is a set of legal, regulatory or practical provisions defining the scope of the power and responsibilities of those responsible for directing the company sustainably. Directing the company means taking and controlling the decisions that have a decisive effect on its soundness and sustainable performance.
[pic 1]
[pic 2]
3 types of shareholders: speculative, sleeping, active
- The history of share ownership in continental Europe
From 1850 to 1930 :
1/ Company : private sphere
- Private property
- Family shareholders
- Middle age vocabulary
2/ Governance mode: Paternalism
- Statistically and ideologically dominant
- Scté en commandite par action
- Authority legitimacy : Traditional society
From 1930 to 1970
1/ Paternalism legitimacy erodes …
- 4 constraints:
- Demographic
- Organisational
- Financial
- Political
2/ Governance of “experts”
- The emergence of technocracy
- Marginalization of shareholders
- Anonymity
- Technocracy self evaluation
Since 1970
1/ Mutations and revolutions in the USA
- The increase of the need for financing
- Diversification of pension funds
- Huge increase pf the capital markets: the capitalization of NY increases from 600 to 17000 billions dollars between 70 and 2000
b- The huge increase of the number of shareholders
- Mass saving world wide phenomenon:
- about 80 milion direct s
c- The implication of Financial institutional intermediaries
- Big investors
- Emergence of lobby groups
- Knowledge is shared : Legitimacy of the manager decreases
d- Technocracy = way to embezzle a part of the profit of the companies to increase the profit of the executive management
e- Political approach: Put some “government” into companies and first reforms:
- More information, more transparency for the shareholders
- More control on Presidents, their pay, remuneration and decisions
- Mo
2/ Internal extension
Big increase of financial needs :
- Diversification of US investors in Europe
- Parallel importation of the democratization of corporate governance
Essentially reactive, emotive, post scandal : disproportionate and inadequate
- Maxwell case
Comparaison of US/UK culture vs continental culture : France, Germany, Italy, Spain…
A company:
USA | Continental Europe |
Is to be sold/bought | Belongd to the “collectivity” |
Financial transparency | Secrecy opacity |
Strong financial markets | Weak |
Strong M&A culture | Banks as shareholder |
Take over bids | Shocking (national identity) |
USA | France |
Primacy of the individual => Shareholder interest | Primacy of the collectivity => Collective interest, stakeholders interest |
Culture of contract => No federal law (state by state – Delaware) | Culture of law => Strength of the law |
USA | France |
Primacy of the market
| Primacy of the state
|
Mistrust towards authority | Deference to the state |
Transparency | Secrecy |
Personal enrichment (protestants) | General interest (catholics) |
Lawyers | “Enarque”: civil servant |
Transparency | Secrecy |
USA : market based system
Before 1929: pre-eminence of banks
1933: - Glass steagall Act : separation between traditional banks
Consequences: Preeminence of financial markets
Stress on financial performance
Stress on management
- Stock options
- Class actions (lawyers)
- Take over bids
- Proxy fights
Examples: - 1956 : The solid gold Cadillac - 1987 : Wall Street
USA: From self regulation to “soft law” and “hard” law?
- Scandals
- Political pressure
- Enron 2002 / Sarbanes Oxley Act SOX
- Subprimes 2010 : Dodd Franck Act
- Board: independence, nomination, evaluation, transparency, call for experts, personal accountability
- Audit committee: accounts, internal control
- Ethics: loyalty, due diligence, whistleblowing
- 2013: “ Benefit corporation”: positive impact on society and environment
Europe: From “hard” law to “soft law” and self regulation
- Compliance vs intelligence
- Inadequate for small businesses
- Nobody understands anything anymore
- Too much transparency kills pertinent information
- A challenge for democracy?
- White collar crimes?
- Greed
- Experts vs ordinary people
- General mistrust of finance, banks…
OECD Current membership
What should a CEO expect from a board? (Enron, K. Lay speech, 1999)
Few French figures
- 72% of companies have a single shareholder (either a physical person or another company)
- 2900 000 companies have from 0 to 50 employees (more than half of them has none: self employment, craftsman)
- 27 600 companies have from 50 to 249
- 4600 comp 250 and 5000 employees
- 700 listed companies- average float: 20%
- Market capitalization below 1 billion euros
- 85% of companies in a number
- 4% of total French capitalization
- 2% of exchanges
3 different types of actors
- The shareholder – The sovereign power
They guarantee the continuity of the company as its highest authority validating the direction of the company and granting legitimacy to those who make the decisions regarding it
...