General theft - stealing from a motor vehicle

Marie-Pierette: Today, we'll have two opposing parties. Ms. Vanderloo, represented by her lawyer Sarah Harche. She is accused of stealing clothes and other equipment amounting to a total of 600 pounds sterling. The victim is Mr. Jackson, who claims that he was robbed of all his belongings when he returned from his shopping spree abroad. We'll open the session right away, starting with the prosecution and then the defense.
Ms Raaven, the prosecution, you can start.

Ranaa: My client is the victim of a scheme. While she was returning home from her holidays, she parked her car in a private residential lot, facing her apartment. At the scene, she was unloading her car, leaving her car trunk open with a lot of items. She trusted her safe neighborhood, but someone illegally got in. The thief trespassed the property and took this opportunity to steal Mr. Jackson items, fleeing the scene.

Marie-Pierette: Has anyone have seen Ms. Vanderloo at the scene?

Ranaa: Well, she was seen by neighbors not only on that day, but the last week before the actual robbery took place. Plus, I must mention, Ms. Vanderloo had to know the code before getting in, which means she may have gotten here the week before with the purpose of committing the crime.


Sarah (Defense): Objection, Your Honor. The prosecution's assertion lacks evidence to support the claim that my client, Ms. Vanderloo, intended to commit theft. Furthermore, the circumstances surrounding the alleged crime suggest otherwise. Ms. Vanderloo is a homeless mother of two young boys, facing extreme circumstances that led to a lapse in judgment, not premeditation. It's essential to recognize that desperation can cloud one's judgment, especially when faced with the overwhelming responsibility of providing for a family under such difficult circumstances.

Ranaa: Your Honor, while I sympathize with Ms. Vanderloo's situation, we cannot ignore the fact that a crime was committed. Whether or not it was premeditated, the theft occurred, and Ms. Vanderloo must be held accountable for her actions. The prosecution seeks justice for the victim, Mr. Jackson, who suffered a significant loss due to Ms. Vanderloo's actions.

Sarah (Defense): Your Honor, it's imperative to consider the mitigating factors in this case. Ms. Vanderloo's circumstances, coupled with her lack of criminal history, indicate that this was an isolated incident borne out of desperation rather than malice. She has expressed remorse for her actions and is committed to making amends. It's crucial not to overlook the human aspect of this case, the struggle of a mother trying to provide for her children in the face of adversity.

Ranaa: Respectfully, Ms. Harche, the law does not distinguish between motives when a crime has been committed. The fact remains that Ms. Vanderloo illegally took property that did not belong to her. We shouldn't allow criminals to get away with their actions just because of their personal situations.

Sarah: I agree, but we also cannot ignore the importance of rehabilitation and redemption in our justice system. Ms. Vanderloo has taken responsibility for her actions and is willing to make restitution. Incarceration would not address the root cause of her behavior but rather exacerbate the challenges she faces as a homeless mother. We must consider the long-term consequences of our actions and strive for a solution that not only serves justice but also allows for the possibility of rehabilitation and a chance for a better future for Ms. Vanderloo and her family.

Ranaa: objection

Marie-Pierette: Objection overruled. Both sides have presented their arguments. Now, Ms. Vanderloo will take the stand to provide her testimony.

Marie-Pierette: And I must add that here in court, we respect everyone involved. We shouldn't label anyone. Justice isn't about saying someone is good or bad; it's about teaching lessons and making the world better. That's why we shouldn't decide too quickly. Remember, everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Let's be patient, listen to what everyone has to say to defend themselves in this case. Ms. Vanderloo, please take the stand and share your testimony.

Ms. Vanderloo: Thank you, Your Honor. On that day, I received a call from my children's school about my eldest son's respiratory infection. The guilt impacted heavily on me, knowing that I couldn't afford to provide him with proper protection against the cold. I don’t have a proper house, nor do I have the money to rent one every month. We had to go from house to house in the cold weather, there were no beds, so we had to sleep on the floor. I hated myself for not giving my sons a real home that they deserved. We didn't have a comforter to keep warm. So, when I saw an opportunity to take the clothes from Ms. Jackson’s car, I acted without thinking straight, out of desperation to keep my children warm. I deeply regret my actions and apologize for the harm I caused.

Ranaa: Ms. Vanderloo, while I empathize with your situation, your actions cannot be excused. Theft is a crime, no matter what the circumstances are. How do you explain memorizing the access code and entering the property without authorization?

...