12 Angry Men
Fiche : 12 Angry Men. Recherche parmi 300 000+ dissertationsPar MatrixKing • 3 Novembre 2020 • Fiche • 791 Mots (4 Pages) • 1 073 Vues
Juror n1 : The foreman,take down notes about the deleberating, keep the jury organized initiates votes with the answer guilty or not guilty, we don't know a thing about his opinion of the case, he sometimes participates to calm the jurors . He's an assistant football coach for childrens outside of being a juror
Juror n2 / supports jurors n8/9 : very shy juror, he works as a bank clerk, participates sometimes to the debate but he's often attacked by jurors 3,7,10 , “looks nervously at the 3rd Juror”.
Juror n3/ Antagonist of jurors 12, 8, 5 : Small buisness owner that employs 34 workers,
bad relationship with his own son so that's why he's always against the defenders/ talking about prejugés : believes that “we would be better off if we “took these tough kids and slapped ‘em down before they make trouble. Save us a lot of time and money.”
is personally offended that his views are questioned. He discredits the 8th juror with personal comments, calling him a “bleeding heart(s)” and a “self appointed public avenger”.
the last to change his vote to not guillty.
Played a game of tic tac toe with juror n12 reflecting a disrespectfull attitude to their legal responsabilities .
Juror n4 / wants to debate : Stock broker meaning that he's very organised and very sure of what he's talking of very smart and not disrespectfull : deals with the facts of the case logically and concretely. Got wrong with the argue with juror n8 about the lady with her glasses
Juror n5 / Wants to debate and supports n9 : Works in a Harlem in a Hospital, grew up in the slums his entire life , helps the case to advance forward, was accused by juror n3 at the beginning of voting not guilty , gives a lot of information about the switch blade: able to identify the proper use of a switchblade
Juror n6 / Supports juror n9 when n3 was disrespecful: House painter had experience of apartments and help case of the testament with the old man and his appartment , easily sawyed : happy that the case continues so he doesn't have to work , respectful , voted for guilty because he is hesitant to put a pontential kill back on the streets
Juror n7 : Quick to condemn the accused but willing to have a debate , he sells marmalade , he wants the deliberations to be over from the beginning to the end of the movie because he has baseball tickets , he switched his vote to note not guilty when there was a tide , seems indefferent to the case
Juror n8 / Protagonist of the movie : he's an architect , was the only one to vote not guilty at the first deliberation , great relationship with n9 he wants to argue for the defendant and wants to discuss about the evidences : testimony of the old man and the lady .
Believes that the boy has the right to a fair trial, even though he comes from a deprived and possibly violent background. He shows a more forgiving, compassionate and sympathetic attitude to the young boy. He points out that the boy has had a miserable life and does not automatically dismiss the boy or become angry towards him. His questions plant doubt in the jurors’ minds, and
...